Skip to content
New: the dataset now includes 2,966 company profiles and every supplied review record. See the methodology →
RankGlobal mapped
InApps Technology logo

InApps Technology

LLM Agents & RAG · Automation & Workflow · Edge AI & IoTHo Chi Minh City, VietnamFounded 2016

InApps Technology is based in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam and works in AI Agents for FinTech Platforms, with further work in Automation & Workflow and Edge AI & IoT.

Average rating
4.9
Reviews
57
Profile coverage
100%
Evidence percentile
P92

Profile updated · Request a correction

Company & commercials

Primary category
LLM Agents & RAG
Team size
50-249 employees
Typical budget
$10K - $50K
Primary industry
Financial Services & Insurance
Contact provider →Visit website ↗
Overview

What InApps Technology does best.

About

LLM Agents & RAG provider for Financial Services & Insurance

Its own website shows its strongest capability in AI Agents within LLM Agents & RAG, alongside Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation. The industry it describes most is FinTech Platforms.

Service model·Service
Primary AI categoryLLM Agents & RAG
Benchmarked against 1,860 providers in this category.
Primary industryFinancial Services & Insurance
Technology stack

6 platforms & methods

Bars show how many mapped capabilities use each one.

  • OpenAI1 capability
  • Claude1 capability
  • Gemini1 capability
  • LangChain1 capability
  • LlamaIndex1 capability
  • AWSProfile only
RankGlobal provider intelligence

Evidence report

How InApps Technology compares with peers on evidence, reviews and coverage.

Analyst brief · Published
CategoryLLM Agents & RAG
Compared with1,860 providers
Signals3 signals
Status● Published
Evidence score
100/100
Strong evidence92nd percentile of 1,860 peers · peer median 70
Profile coverage100
Taxonomy density100
Review signal100
Peer benchmarkHow the profile comparesLLM Agents & RAG among 1,860 published providers
Average rating4.91 · median 4.89
Independent reviews57 · median 0
Profile completeness100% · median 70%
Taxonomy breadth24 · median 20
This profile Peer median
Signal radarMulti-dimensional evidence
RatingIndependent reviewsCoverageBreadth
This profile (percentile) Peer median
Industries6 industries
Financial Services & Insurance36%
Retail, Wholesale & Consumer Goods18%
Technology, Software & Digital Infrastructure18%
Education & Research9%
Healthcare & Life Sciences9%
Transportation, Logistics & Supply Chain9%
Share of mapped industries, not share of work or revenue.
Evidence mixMapping grades
88%Direct · 21 mappings
13%Supported · 3 mappings
Grades across 24 mappings. Not a search ranking.
Analyst summary

What the evidence says

InApps Technology presents as a strong evidence profile for LLM Agents & RAG. It ranks in the 92nd percentile of 1,860 published providers in LLM Agents & RAG, and 57 reviews back the commercial profile.

Current positioning: P92 evidence quality · P59 industry breadth
Strongest signalsEvidence-backed strength in LLM Agents & RAG is the profile's clearest signal in the mapped taxonomy.
Best user fitFinancial Services & Insurance buyers evaluating LLM Agents & RAG at a $10K - $50K engagement size.
Confirm before engagementConfirm current delivery capacity directly — mapped signals reflect profile evidence, not live availability.
How this report is calculated →
Capabilities

AI capabilities.

AI category · 1 / 12

Automation & Workflow

—
DirectSupportedRelatedAdjacentOne of 1,839 providers in this category
Compare Automation & Workflow providers →
Technology used

None of the listed technologies is specific to Automation & Workflow.

Mapping source · https://inapps.net/ — “ent UI/UX Product Design AI Solutions AI Agent Development Generative AI Integration AI Consulting Engineering & Managed Services DevOps Consulting QA & T”

Featured 12 of 13 capabilities, ranked by mapping grade then confidence.

Industry experience · 6 industries · 11 subindustries

Industries served.

6 Core0 Adjacent · discovery only
  • FinTech PlatformsDirect · Primary
    95%

    https://inapps.net/services/offshore-software-development-center — “ery 1+ years partnership React Native Firebase AWS Node.js PostgreSQL Fintech Citizen Debt Services · Staff Augmentation AI-integrated fintech plat”

  • InsuranceDirect
    95%

    https://inapps.net/services/offshore-software-development-center — “the US ( InCorp Vietnam, 2026 ). Included in the monthly fee Salary, insurance and 13th-month bonus Office, devices and facilities Recruitment, HR a”

  • InsurTechDirect
    95%

    https://inapps.net/services/offshore-software-development-center — “case studies ODC Model Dedicated Team Staff Augmentation Fixed-Price Insurtech Prudential · ODC Model Insurance operations platform Prudential neede”

  • 80%

    https://inapps.net/services/custom-software-development — “es each one difficult Industry What we build there What makes it hard Banking & fintech Core integrations, payment flows, customer portals Audit tr”

Client feedback

What clients say.

4.957 independent reviews

Compiled from independent review platforms and client reviews verified by RankGlobal. How we count reviews

Worked with InApps Technology? Review them → Every reviewer is verified by RankGlobal.

Methodology

How RankGlobal maps this profile.

RankGlobal maps this profile against a controlled taxonomy. Mapping grades on capability and industry cards describe how the profile is classified. Source strength for ranking decisions follows the hierarchy published on Research — a mapping grade is not a claim of discoverability weight.

  1. T1AuthoritativeTypical evidenceRegulators, registries, certifications, signed client evidence.Scoring useHighest evidentiary weight
  2. T2IndependentTypical evidenceCredible media, industry bodies, partner directories, third-party datasets.Scoring useStrong with attribution and recency
  3. T3Provider-controlledTypical evidenceCompany site, case studies, press releases, structured submissions.Scoring useAccepted as a claim; verification raises weight
  4. T4Discovery-onlyTypical evidenceDirectory listings, aggregations, and early discovery signals.Scoring useUsed for discovery; weighted accordingly in ranking
Direct, Supported, Related and Adjacent appear on mapped cards as classification grades. They do not rank how discoverable a provider should be.RankGlobal trust center →
Ready to evaluate this provider

Move from discovery to a focused conversation.

Your enquiry goes to the RankGlobal research team, not the provider's sales inbox. Sending it does not affect their ranking.

Before you reach outKey facts, and three things to confirm once you're in touch.
Primary category
LLM Agents & RAG
Primary industry
Financial Services & Insurance
Typical budget
$10K - $50K
Team size
50-249 employees
  1. 1Name the use caseSay which LLM Agents & RAG problem you are evaluating, so the research team can route your message accurately.
  2. 2Pressure-test the budget bandThe $10K - $50K band on file is a profile-level figure. Ask what a scope like yours actually lands at.
  3. 3Ask for a referenceRequest a client reference in Financial Services & Insurance — the strongest industry signal on this profile.
Still comparing? Re-read the mapping evidence or go back to all providers.

Enquire about InApps Technology

Three fields. Anything longer belongs on the full contact page, linked below.

Is this your company? Claim this profile →

Rankings

Where InApps Technology ranks

  1. #2Top LLM Agent & RAG Firms Worldwide
  2. #8Top AI companies in Education & Research
Badges for InApps Technology's website (2)

A firm in the top 10 of a ranking can show it on its own site. Badges are earned, never sold, and always show the current place. How badges work.

InApps Technology: #2 in Top LLM Agent & RAG Firms Worldwide on RankGlobal
InApps Technology: #8 in Top AI companies in Education & Research on RankGlobal